Blogger Template by Blogcrowds.



The US ambassador to Germany, Philip Murphy, sought Wednesday to stem the diplomatic damage from awkward cables on WikiLeaks, calling the maligned foreign minister "a friend".
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, seen here in November 2010. The US ambassador to Germany, Philip Murphy, sought Wednesday to stem the diplomatic damage from awkward cables on WikiLeaks, calling the maligned foreign minister "a friend".
Amid demands for his sacking, Murphy called the release of the documents featuring frank opinions about German leaders "embarrassing and deeply uncomfortable", in an interview with people magazine Bunte.
In cables from Berlin signed by Murphy, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, who is also Germany's vice chancellor, comes in for the most withering criticism, branded incompetent, vain and critical of America.
But Murphy insisted his relations with Westerwelle had not suffered.
"He is a true friend," Murphy is quoted as saying. "I have great respect for him. These comments are only snapshots and do not take the entire picture, the great German-American film, into account. Guido Westerwelle knows this."
Murphy, a former Goldman Sachs executive and a major fundraiser for US President Barack Obama, has faced calls from deputies from Westerwelle's Free Democrats for Washington to recall him.
Merkel's spokesman said Friday that the government did not share these views, calling US-German ties "robust".
Meanwhile comments by Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle in which he compared the vast collection of US diplomatic cables with the practice of the despised East German Stasi secret police of keeping copious records on its citizens sparked a barrage of critical questions at a government briefing Wednesday.
"Some of what I read on WikiLeaks reminds me of the collecting mania that former institutions in the East, including the Stasi, had," Bruederle told a conference Tuesday.
A ministry spokeswoman said Bruederle intended to criticise WikiLeaks' practices, not the United States.

Russia can face a small conflict in West of the country but cannot answer simultaneously to two conflicts or one conflict in the East, an American cablegate regarding NATO’s answer to the Russian military exercises in 2009 that has been criticized even by Romania reads, news agency Mediafax reports.  

In the note released by Wikileaks and quoted by Aftenposten in its online edition, NATO presented on November 18, 2009 a report on the Russian military exercises at Zapad and Ladoga. Exercises focused on countering a possible attack launched by Poland and Lithuania against Russia and Bielorus and included the used of ballistic missiles.  

NATO’s report read that the military Russian exercises were aimed to remedy deficiencies identified in the 2008 conflict in Georgia. Russia’s military exercises, according to the report, proved that the country has a limited capacity to run operations in collaboration with air forces and continues to rely on old equipments and needs more military.  

Canada and several other allied countries in Eastern and Central Europe including Romania criticized the “failure”of NATO to give a proper response to the Russian military exercises. Critics were included n a document signed by Poland, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania tht asked the organization of talks on Russia within NATO. Romania expressed its views that Russia’s exercises resemble with those it conducted in the Cold War period and are part of a worrying behavior.

Japan was warned more than two years ago by the international nuclear watchdog that its nuclear power plants were not capable of withstanding powerful earthquakes, leaked diplomatic cables reveal.

Japan earthquake: Japan warned over nuclear plants, WikiLeaks cables show
Evacuees are screened for radiation contamination at a testing center in Koriyama City, Fukushima Prefecture

An official from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in December 2008 that safety rules were out of date and strong earthquakes would pose a "serious problem" for nuclear power stations.
The Japanese government pledged to upgrade safety at all of its nuclear plants, but will now face inevitable questions over whether it did enough.
While it responded to the warnings by building an emergency response centre at the Fukushima plant, it was only designed to withstand magnitude 7.0 tremors. Friday's devastating earthquake was a magnitude 9.0 shock.
The news is likely to put further pressure on Japan's Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, who has been criticised for "dithering" over the country's response to the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Panic started to spread throughout Japan yesterday following the news that a third explosion at the plant might have damaged the protective casing around the reactor core, increasing the threat of radioactive leaks.

The government was considering using helicopters to spray water over the Fukushima site to limit the spread of radioactive particles as part of its increasingly desperate attempts to keep the situation under control.
Meanwhile the FTSE-100 share index fell by 1.4 per cent as stock markets around the world slumped in response to a 10.6 per cent drop in Japan's Nikkei index.
Warnings about the safety of nuclear power plants in Japan, one of the most seismologically active countries in the world, were raised during a meeting of the G8's Nuclear Safety and Security Group in Tokyo in 2008.
A US embassy cable obtained by the WikiLeaks website and seen by The Daily Telegraph quoted an unnamed expert who expressed concern that guidance on how to protect nuclear power stations from earthquakes had only been updated three times in the past 35 years.
The document states: "He [the IAEA official] explained that safety guides for seismic safety have only been revised three times in the last 35 years and that the IAEA is now re-examining them.
"Also, the presenter noted recent earthquakes in some cases have exceeded the design basis for some nuclear plants, and that this is a serious problem that is now driving seismic safety work."
The cables also disclose how the Japanese government opposed a court order to shut down another nuclear power plant in western Japan because of concerns it could not withstand powerful earthquakes.
The court ruled that there was a possibility local people might be exposed to radiation if there was an accident at the plant, which was built to out of date specifications and only to withstand a "6.5 magnitude" earthquake. Last Friday's earthquake, 81 miles off the shore of Japan, was a magnitude 9.0 tremor.
However, a cable from March 2006 reported that the court's concerns were not shared by the country's nuclear safety agency.
It says: "Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency believes the reactor is safe and that all safety analyses were appropriately conducted."
The Government successfully overturned the ruling in 2009.
Another cable reported to Washington local concerns that a new generation of Japanese power stations that recycle nuclear fuel were jeopardising safety.
The cable, quoting a local newspaper, reports: "There is something precarious about the way all electric power companies are falling in step with each other under the banner of the national policy. We have seen too many cases of cost reduction competition through heightened efficiency jeopardizing safety."
The cables also disclose how Taro Kono, a high-profile member of Japan's lower house, told US diplomats in October 2008 that the government was "covering up" nuclear accidents.
He alleged that the government was ignoring alternative forms of energy, such as wind power.
The cable states: "He also accused METI [the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry] of covering up nuclear accidents, and obscuring the true costs and problems associated with the nuclear industry." He added that the Japan's "extensive seismic" activity raised safety concerns about storing nuclear material.
Mr Kan was not in office at the time the nuclear warnings were made. He became science and technology minister in 2009 and prime minister in June 2010.

German police officers guard the U.S. embassy in Berlin on Nov. 29, 2010

Just when it looked like U.S.-German relations were on the mend after the fallout over the Iraq war — when then Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's vocal opposition to the U.S. invasion in 2003 put Germany on a collision course with the Bush Administration — the leaking of classified cables from U.S. embassies has threatened to cause a new diplomatic row. German newsmagazine Der Spiegel was given advanced access to hundreds of documents released by the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, and the magazine showed no mercy, splashing the story on its cover on Monday. The memos — emanating from a reported 1,719 documents from the U.S. embassy in Berlin — reveal that diplomats regarded German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a leader who approached international relations with the aim of reaping domestic political gain. In one cable sent from the embassy on March 24, 2009, Merkel is called "risk averse and rarely creative"; in another, dated early 2009, the U.S. ambassador to Germany, Philip Murphy, reportedly describes Merkel as "insecure" in her dealings with the new U.S. government. And in other documents, the Chancellor is given the undiplomatic nickname of "Angela 'Teflon' Merkel" for her habit of steering clear of conflict.

"The leak is extremely awkward for the U.S. embassy in Berlin, and it's bound to sour personal relations between U.S. officials and German politicians," says Volker Perthes, director of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. "It's also damaging for the U.S. State Department, as from now on it will get fewer frank assessments from German officials and politicians."(See the top 10 leaks.)
Perhaps the harshest criticism is reserved for Merkel's Vice-Chancellor, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, who in various memos is slammed as incompetent, vain and critical of the U.S. On Sept. 18, 2009, just days before German's federal election, the U.S. embassy sent a cable calling Westerwelle "opportunistic" and "arrogant and too fixated on maintaining his 'cult of personality' " and saying he had little experience in foreign policy. In a document dated Feb. 4, 2010, Defense Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg is reported to have told U.S. Ambassador Murphy that Westerwelle was "the single biggest obstacle" to a request from the U.S. for more German troops in Afghanistan.
In fact, Guttenberg is virtually the only German minister to emerge from the revelations untainted. Described as a "close and well-known friend of the U.S.," the affable politician is praised for being a "foreign policy expert and transatlanticist." Meanwhile, Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble is unflatteringly noted as being "neurotic" and "an angry old man."(See more on WikiLeaks.)
Der Spiegel called the publication of the confidential information a "disaster for U.S. diplomacy," while the mass-market daily Bild said the revelations were a "political earthquake." As Germany's political establishment braces itself for more embarrassing revelations, ministers have been forced onto the defensive. At a news conference on Monday, Westerwelle told reporters that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called him on Friday to express her "deep regret" about the imminent leak. And German government officials are desperately trying to reassure the Obama Administration that U.S.-German relations are still on track. On Monday, Merkel spokesman Steffen Seibert insisted to reporters that ties between the two countries were "firm" and "robust" and would not be harmed.
While many analysts say the leaked memos will not affect the main areas of cooperation between Berlin and Washington — over Iran or climate change, for example — the candid comments about German politicians have gone down like a lead balloon. "This will be damaging," said Ruprecht Polenz, a member of Merkel's CDU party, to public broadcaster ZDF on Monday, adding that Washington would have to reassure its allies that it can be trusted and that the Obama Administration must review its security measures. "The revelations are embarrassing — because they make classified cables public, and not because of their content," says Constanze Stelzenmüller, senior transatlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Berlin. "A lot of the assessments of German policymakers seem accurate. I suspect they are widely shared in Berlin."(See pictures of the rise and fall of the Berlin Wall.)
As the man whose name often appears on the leaked memos, U.S. Ambassador Murphy has had to do the rounds on TV to try to calm the media storm. "This is completely and utterly irresponsible," he fumed during an interview with ZDF on Monday, admitting there would be "bumps in the road and broken china" in the days ahead.
It's still too early to predict the long-term consequences of the latest WikiLeaks revelations, but one thing is clear: in the future, German politicians will probably think twice about confiding in U.S. officials. As former U.S. ambassador to Germany John Kornblum told ZDF on Monday, "If that trust is broken, as is now the case, then of course you need to start back at zero." Hardly a tantalizing prospect for Germany's diplomatic corps.

France is facing possible legal action from the European Union over its policy of tearing down makeshift Gypsy settlements and hastily deporting their residents to Eastern Europe. 

Since the beginning of the year, at least 8,000 Roma (as the Gypsy people are known) have been rounded up and sent to Romania and Bulgaria,according to France 24. Human rights groups, the Catholic Church and even members of President Nicolas Sarkozy's conservative Cabinet have condemned the policy, which many critics believe is designed to boost Sarkozy's popularity at a time of unpopular spending cuts. 

Viviane Reding, the European commissioner for justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, today joined that growing wave of criticism. At a press conference in Brussels, she labeled the Roma expulsions "a disgrace" and said the policy was likely illegal under European law. 

Members of the Roma community react after being forced out of their camp in Saint Denis, north of Paris on July 6.
Paul Szajner, AFP / Getty Images
Members of the Roma community react after being forced out of their camp in Saint Denis, north of Paris, on July 6. The French government faces possible legal action from the European Union over its treatment of Gypsies.

"I personally have been appalled by a situation which gave the impression that people are being removed from a member state of the European Union just because they belong to a certain ethnic minority," she said. "This is a situation I had thought Europe would not have to witness again after the Second World War."

Reding added that the European Commission -- the EU's executive body -- now had "no choice but to initiate infringement procedures against France," meaning Sarkozy's government could be hauled before the European Court of Justice and hit with hefty fines.

That new tough line is in marked contrast to the EU's relatively meek approach to date. Last week, for instance, Reding announced that the French government was sending "very positive" signals on its Roma policy. And after a meeting with Sarkozy last week, Jose Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, said he didn't want to turn the issue into a "controversy."

However, the European Commission changed its tone following the leak of a damning French government document. Throughout the removal campaign, both Sarkozy and his immigration minister, Eric Besson, have claimed that authorities were treating Roma no differently than other EU citizens who didn't meet France's residency rules. 

The leaked memo, though -- dated Aug. 5 and signed by Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux's chief of staff -- reminds French officials that a "specific objective" had been set out by Sarkozy. "Three hundred camps or illegal settlements must be evacuated within three months; Roma camps are a priority," the memo read, according to The Guardian. "It is down to the [state representative] in each department to begin a systematic dismantling of the illegal camps, particularly those of the Roma." 

Besson later told French TV that he "wasn't a recipient" of the letter "and therefore I didn't need to know about it."
The Guardian notes that France could have violated a 2004 law that guarantees EU citizens -- including Roma originally from Bulgaria or Romania -- freedom of movement across the union's 27 member states. And the EU's charter of fundamental rights also outlaws discrimination on ethnic grounds, which should have stopped French authorities collectively targeting the Gypsies, Europe's largest ethnic minority. 

French Foreign Ministry spokesman Bernard Valero told the BBC that Reding's statement was unhelpful. "We don't think that with this type of statement, that we can improve the situation of the Roma, who are at the heart of our concerns and our action," he said.

If the European Commission does crack down on France, other European nations might also be forced to rethink their apparently discriminatory targeting of the Roma. Italy, for instance, is pushing through legislation that will make it easier to expel Gypsies. And even once-welcoming countries like Sweden and Denmark have begun, albeit quietly, deporting Roma who also hold EU citizenship.

Semyon Mogilevich, one of FBI's most wanted people, identified as real power behind billionaire owner of Ukrainian-based RUE
Semyon Mogilevich

US embassy cables show the Russian mafia boss Semyon Mogilevich is linked to RosUkrEnergo gas company. Photograph: FBI/AFP/Getty Images

We have received a legal complaint from lawyers acting for Dmitry Firtash about this article. Mr Firtash complains that the contents of the article are untrue.

Gas supplies to Ukraine and EU states are linked to the Russian mafia, according to the US ambassador in Kiev.
His cable, released by WikiLeaks, followed statements by the then prime minister of Ukraine, Yulia Tymoshenko, to the BBC that she had "documented proof that some powerful criminal structures are behind the RosUkrEnergo (RUE) company".
Allegations have long swirled that the Russian crime don Semyon Mogilevich had covert interests in Swiss-registered RUE, which distributes gas from central Asia.
A billionaire Ukrainian businessman, Dmitry Firtash, nominally owns nearly half the company. (The Russian state firm Gazprom owns the other half.) In a confidential meeting with the ambassador, Firtash admitted Mogilevich was the real power behind his own multibillion-dollar gas interests. He insisted it was impossible to do business in Ukraine in the 1990s without striking sleazy deals with organised criminals.
In a secret memo the ambassador, William Taylor, wrote: "He [Firtash] acknowledged ties to Russian organised crime figure Semyon Mogilevich, stating he had needed Mogilevich's approval to get into business in the first place." Taylor said the "softly spoken" Firtash had come to see him on 8 December 2008 and "spoke at length about his business and politics in a visible effort to improve his image with the USG [United States government]".
His arguments were obviously "self-interested", Taylor said. "In a lengthy monologue Firtash described his evolution as a businessman from his beginnings as a food trader to the creation of RUE … He was adamant that he had not committed a single crime when building his business empire and argued that outsiders still failed to understand the period of lawlessness that reigned in Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union."
Taylor grilled the oligarch about his alleged ties to Russian organised crime. The Ukrainian press had widely reported that RUE's circle of true beneficiaries included Mogilevich. Firtash countered that it had been impossible to approach a government official for any reason "without also meeting an organised crime member".
The cable stated: "Firtash acknowledged that he needed, and received, permission from Mogilevich when he established various businesses, but he denied any close relationship to him."
Other cables said the two men were closely linked through "joint holdings in offshore vehicles" and "mutual personal relationships". They also share the same lawyer.
[This update was inserted on 7 December 2010: Following publication of this cable, Dmitry Firtash issued a statement denying that Semyon Mogilevich had ever had any partnership or holding or other direct or indirect commercial associations or business interests with him. See footnote.]
During his frank conversation with the ambassador, Firtash launched an attack on Tymoshenko. At the time she was locked in a power struggle with her former Orange Revolution ally Viktor Yushchenko, who was president. Firtash called himself Yushchenko's "close friend" and confidant, and his anger was understandable. A month before he met the ambassador, Tymoshenko had reached a provisional agreement with the Russian prime minister, Vladimir Putin, to abolish all intermediaries in the murky gas trade with Russia. The deal – still unimplemented – was specifically drawn up to get rid of RosUkrEnergo.
The US says Mogilevich is one of the world's top mafia bosses, accusing him of creating eastern Europe's most powerful crime group in the 1990s. He is on the list of the FBI's 10 most wanted fugitives for his alleged part in a multimillion-dollar fraud involving a Pennsylvania-based company in the 90s.
The Russians arrested Mogilevich in 2008 over tax evasion at a cosmetics chain. But in 2009 he was mysteriously released. Russia's interior ministry described the charges against him as "not of a particularly grave nature". The cable is deeply embarrassing for Ukraine's new pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych. Firtash, the founder and chairman of Group DF, is one of the main oligarchs who financed Yanukovych's rise to power this year.Firtash's business interests across Europe include energy, chemicals and real estate, and he owns an influential Ukrainian TV station.
In his cable Taylor noted that the gas trade had made Firtash staggeringly rich: "By 2006 Firtash's estimated worth was over $5bn, but most experts believed that Firtash had low-balled his true worth and estimated it was in the tens of billions. In his conversation with the ambassador Firtash gave no indication of the scope of his wealth."

An independent investigation into Switzerland's wartime past has published a report which concludes that the country largely ignored moral and ethical issues.
The Bergier Commission, which was set up in 1996 by the Swiss parliament to examine Swiss relations with the Axis powers, claims that the Swiss authorities had secret dealings with Nazi Germany which helped to prolong the second world war.


The study also says the Swiss refused to allow refuge to thousands of Jews in spite of the fact they already knew of the existence of concentration camps.
The nine members of the commission who come from Switzerland, Britain, the United States and Israel have spent five years on their research.
They say Swiss authorities of having contributed to the expansion of the Nazi economy, by striking trade and financial agreements with Germany which helped to fund the Nazi regime.

nazi gold bar
Complicity
They add that the provision of interest free credits to the Axis powers by the Swiss banks, and their willingness to trade gold for the valuable Swiss franc, allowed the Nazis to buy machinery and even war materiel from Switzerland.
But the commission says its most disturbing finding was learning of the effect of the "excessively restrictive" Swiss policy towards refugees.
According to the commissioners, and to Swiss sociologist, Professor Jean Ziegler, the Swiss authorities knowingly sent refugees to their deaths.
"The Swiss Government and the army leadership knew exactly what would happen to the men women and children they turned down at the Swiss borders," he said.
"The Bergier report says there were 110,000 Jewish people turned back. And I think that`s a complicity in genocide, that`s a complicity in genocide."
The report has been contested by right-wing groups who claim the commission was biased and did not carry out sufficient research.

A Mexican Cabinet minister told U.S. officials late last year that he had a "real concern" that Mexico would lose control of parts of the country to drug traffickers, according to a U.S. State Department cable released on Thursday by WikiLeaks.

Soldiers ride in  a truck in Acapulco
Soldiers ride in a truck while patrolling along a busy street in Acapulco Photo: REUTERS
Undersecretary for the Interior Geronimo Gutiérrez Fernandez, who oversees domestic security, "expressed a real concern with 'losing' certain regions," according to the memo, posted online on Thursday by the newspaper El Pais of Spain as a growing list of sensitive U.S. government messages were released by WikiLeaks.
"It is damaging Mexico's international reputation, hurting foreign investment, and leading to a sense of government impotence, Gutiérrez said," according to the memo.
The Oct. 5, 2009 cable describes a dinner that the Mexican Attorney General hosted for a delegation from the U.S. Department of Justice. It also quoted Mr Gutiérrez as saying the $1.4 billion Merida Initiative, the United States' major effort to help Mexico fight the drug war, was too hastily crafted to be effective.
"In retrospect he and other GOM (Government of Mexico) officials realise that not enough strategic thought went into Merida in the early phase," the memo said. "There was too much emphasis in the initial planning on equipment, which they now know is slow to arrive and even slower to be of direct utility in the fight against the DTOs (drug-trafficking organisations.)"
President Felipe Calderón, who launched an assault on drug cartels in 2006, has maintained the federal government has control over all the country. Both the U.S. and Mexico have said recently that Merida money in the future would be directed towards creating more effective institutions.
Contacted on Thursday afternoon, Mr Calderon's office said it had just seen the cables and had no immediate comment.
Mexican officials also proposed a strategy of regaining order in three of the most violent cities – Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, and Culiacán, in the western state of Sinaloa, home to the powerful cartel of the same name, the cable said.
Mr Gutiérrez and National Security System Coordinator Jorge Tello Peon said Mr Calderón has to stop the violence in Ciudad Juarez, the cable said.
"Politically ... Calderón has staked so much of his reputation there, with a major show of force that, to date, has not panned out," the cable said Mr Gutiérrez and Mr Peon told U.S. officials at the dinner.


In February of last year, U.S. diplomatic posts were given one month by Washington to compile and forward an inventory of critical infrastructure and key resources in their respective reporting areas “whose loss could critically impact the public health, economic security, and/or national and homeland security of the United States.” The U.S. embassy in Ottawa – and the string of American consulates across Canada – were included in this “action request.”
Yesterday, WikiLeaks – presumably at the direction of its increasingly besieged leader – struck back at its American tormentors by posting on its website the diplomatic cable that includes the requested compilation.
Behind its pay-wall, the Times of London, which fronts the story, reports that “Sir Malcolm Rifkind, a former British Defence and Foreign Secretary and chairman of the Commons Intelligence and Security Committee, said WikiLeaks had made no credible attempt to find out whether the material could assist terrorists.
‘This is further evidence that they have been generally irresponsible, bordering on criminal. This is the kind of information terrorists are interested in knowing’.
But WikiLeaks said that the document, approved by Hillary Clinton, provided further evidence that the U.S. Administration was hoarding sensitive information on countries without their knowledge….
Kristinn Hrafnsson, a spokesman for the website, said: “This further undermines claims made by the US Government that its embassy officials do not play an intelligence-gathering role.”
Not surprisingly given that we share a continent, the U.S. compilation of critical infrastructure and key resources in foreign countries includes many sites and undertakings in Canada, from Nova Scotia to British Columbia. Dams; undersea cables; oil and gas pipelines; border crossings, including bridges; nuclear power plants; defence production factories; mines; and, last but not least, pharmaceutical and vaccine production plants.
While, there has been considerable sympathy to date for WikiLeaks and for Mr. Assange, I suspect that some of this might erode once Canadians get a look at this latest cable, which is now widely available, and which sets out the juiciest targets in Canada for those looking to do harm to the United States. Moreover, once Canadians have had a chance to examine the list of sites it includes, I doubt that many of our compatriots will conclude that its compilation by U.S. diplomats serving in this country amounts to anything remotely connected to what we understand to constitute espionage:
Canada: Hibernia Atlantic undersea cable landing Halifax , Nova Scotia, Canada James Bay Power Project, Quebec: monumental hydroelectric power development Mica Dam, British Columbia: Failure would impact the Columbia River Basin. Hydro Quebec, Quebec: Critical irreplaceable source of power to portions of Northeast U. S. Robert Moses/Robert H. Saunders Power, Ontario: Part of the St. Lawrence Power Project, between Barnhart Island, New York, and Cornwall, Ontario Seven Mile Dam, British Columbia: Concrete gravity dam between two other hydropower dams along the Pend d'Oreille River Pickering Nuclear Power Plant, Ontario, Canada Chalk River Nuclear Facility, Ontario: Largest supplier of medical radioisotopes in the world Hydrofluoric Acid Production Facility, Allied Signal, Amherstburg, Ontario Enbridge Pipeline Alliance Pipeline: Natural gas transmission from Canada Maritime and Northeast Pipeline: Natural gas transmission from Canada Transcanada Gas: Natural gas transmission from Canada Alexandria Bay POE, Ontario: Northern border crossing Ambassador Bridge POE, Ontario: Northern border crossing Blaine POE, British Columbia: Northern border crossing Blaine Washington Rail Crossing, British Columbia Blue Water Bridge POE, Ontario: Northern border crossing Champlain POE, Quebec: Northern border crossing CPR Tunnel Rail Crossing, Ontario (Michigan Central Rail Crossing) International Bridge Rail Crossing, Ontario International Railway Bridge Rail Crossing Lewiston-Queenstown POE, Ontario: Northern border crossing Peace Bridge POE, Ontario: Northern border crossing Pembina POE, Manitoba: Northern border crossing North Portal Rail Crossing, Saskatchewan St. Claire Tunnel Rail Crossing, Ontario Waneta Dam, British Columbia: Earthfill/concrete hydropower dam Darlington Nuclear Power Plant, Ontario, Canada. E-ONE Moli Energy, Maple Ridge, Canada: Critical to production of various military application electronics General Dynamics Land Systems – Canada, London Ontario, Canada: Critical to the production of the Stryker/USMC LAV Vehicle Integration Raytheon Systems Canada Ltd. ELCAN Optical Technologies Division, Midland, Ontario, Canada: Critical to the production of the AGM-130 Missile Thales Optronique Canada, Inc., Montreal, Quebec: Critical optical systems for ground combat vehicles Germanium Mine Graphite Mine Iron Ore Mine Nickel Mine Niobec Mine, Quebec, Canada: Niobium Cangene, Winnipeg, Manitoba: Plasma Sanofi Pasteur Ltd., Toronto, Canada: Polio virus vaccine GlaxoSmithKile Biologicals, North America, Quebec, Canada: Pre-pandemic influenza vaccines.


• Minister warns of consequences for companies helping keep WikiLeaks online
• US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks are hosted by French firm
Wikileaks.org
WikiLeaks has been part-hosted by OVH, a small web hosting company based in northern France. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
The French government today added to international calls for WikiLeaks to be prevented operating online, warning that it is "unacceptable" for a "criminal" site to be hosted in the country.
Today's move by the French government is particularly significant because the 250,000 US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks to the Guardian and four other media organisations are hosted by a French company, Octopuce.
The industry minister, Eric Besson, today wrote to the French body governing internet use warning that there would be consequences for any companies or organisations helping to keep WikiLeaks online in the country.
French companies are banned from hosting websites that have been deemed "criminal" and "violate the confidentiality of diplomatic relations", Besson added.
WikiLeaks has been part-hosted by OVH, a small web hosting company based in northern France, since Thursday, when it was dropped by Amazon following pressure from Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate's committee on homeland security and one of its fiercest critics.
The site's cache of more than 250,000 diplomatic cables are also hosted in part by Octopuce, though they are also widely available on peer-to-peer filesharing sites which do not sit under the jurisdiction of one state.
Besson today said: "France cannot host internet sites that violate the confidentiality of diplomatic relations and put in danger people who are protected by diplomatic secrecy.
"I ask you to indicate to me as soon as possible what action can be taken to ensure that this internet site is no longer hosted in France."
OVH quickly hit back at the French government, saying "it's not up to politicians or OVH to decide the site's closure". The company said it will consult a judge on whether it is legal to host the whistleblowing site in France.
WikiLeaks was today largely offline for the third time in a week afterbeing dropped by its US-hosting providerEverydns. The California-based provider says it pulled the plug on WikiLeaks following a series of online attacks which threatened to destabilise the service it offers to 500,000 other companies.
The site is currently only available at the Swiss domain, WikiLeaks.ch, and a number of IP strings.
Julian Assange. WiliLeaks founder, earlier today said the development is an example of the "privatisation of state censorship" in the US and is a "serious problem".
"These attacks will not stop our mission, but should be setting off alarm bells about the rule of law in the United States," he warned.
In a question-and-answer session on the Guardian's website, Assange today said WikiLeaks has been "deliberately placing" some of its servers in countries he suspects have a "free speech deficit". "Amazon was one of these cases," he added.

Postări mai noi Postări mai vechi Pagina de pornire