Wiki Leaks

WikiLeaks: Germany Protests U.S. Military Docking Milllions from Afghan Army Fund

Wednesday, 03 February 2010, 15:56

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 USNATO 000052

SIPDIS

EO 12958 DECL: 02/03/2020
TAGS MOPS, MASS, MCAP, PREL, PGOV, NATO, AF, GM
SUBJECT: RFG: GERMAN DEMARCHE ON DISBURSEMENT OF
CONTRIBUTION TO ANA TRUST FUND

Classified By: A/PolAd A. “Hoot” Baez. Reasons: 1.4 (b) and (d).

1. (SBU) This is a request for guidance. Please see para 8.

2. (C) SUMMARY: On February 3, German PermRep Brandenburg demarched Ambassador Daalder regarding concerns Berlin has over the disbursement of 50 million Euros it donated in October 2009 to the Afghan National Army Trust Fund. He said that money for earmarked projects had not been disbursed, resulting in delayed projects. He also said that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was charging a 15 percent administrative fee. He said that German parliamentarians were beginning to ask questions about how this money has been handled, adding that this could make it difficult for Berlin to provide additional contributions in the future. Ambassador Daalder said that he believed there were some factual inaccuracies in the German demarche, but promised to forward it to Washington for a formal response. We request Washington guidance NLT Monday, February 8, on how to respond to Brandenburg. We ask that in drafting this guidance Washington take into consideration appropriate political factors, as well as technical budget and project management ones. END SUMMARY

Germany: Why Has Our Money Not Been Used on Our Projects?

——————————————— ————

2. (C/REL GERMANY) On February 3, German PermRep Brandenburg demarched Ambassador Daalder regarding 50 million euros that Berlin had donated to the Afghan National Army (ANA) Trust Fund in October 2009, handing over a non-paper reported in para 10 below. According to Brandenburg, this money had been earmarked for use in several specific projects — the ANS Logistics School in Kabul, an engineering school in Mazar-e-Sharif, and an ANA Barracks in Feyzabad — but so far no money had been disbursed for these projects. He argued, for example that construction of the logistics school had come to a halt.

And Why Are You Charging Us an Administrative Fee?

——————————————— —–

3. (C/REL GERMANY) Brandenburg said that he had been instructed to raise this with us because of the unique role of the U.S., particularly the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in this process. He said that there was a particular concern in Berlin about a 15 percent administrative fee allegedly being charged by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. At the same time, he acknowledged that Berlin also had issues with how SHAPE and the NATO Office of Resources was handling the issue, adding that Germany would also be raising this issue with NATO officials.

Creates Problems for Future Donations to the ANA Trust Fund

——————————————— ————–

4. (C/REL GERMANY) Brandenburg said that this was more than a technical budget and project management issue He said that several German parliamentarians were asking questions about these funds. He said that the German Government was in the process of preparing its 2010 budget and would like to be able to make an additional contribution to the ANA Trust Fund, but that parliamentary questions and concerns about how the initial 50 million euro contribution was being handled could make this increasingly difficult. He added that — since this was becoming “the talk of the town” in Kabul — it might also create difficulties in our ability to get other countries to contribute to the ANA Trust Fund.

5. (C/REL Germany) Brandenburg said that this demarche would be delivered in Washington, as well as other places. (Note: We understand it was also delivered to the Embassy Berlin.)

German FM to Raise with SecGen

——————————

6. (C/REL GERMANY) Brandenburg said that since this money came from the MFA, German FM Westerwelle had taken an interest in the issue and would likely raise this with NATO

USNATO 00000052 002 OF 003

Secretary General Rasmussen when he sees him at the Munich Security Conference.

Daalder: Inaccuracies, but Will Seek Washington Guidance

——————————————— ———–

7. (C/REL GERMANY) The Ambassador said that there appeared to be some factual inaccuracies in the German demarche, but promised to forward it to Washington with a request for a formal response.

REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE

——————–

8. (C) RFG: We request Washington guidance NLT Monday, February 8, on how to respond to the German demarche.

9. (C/NF) COMMENT: As the Ambassador said to Brandenburg, there do seem to be some inaccuracies in the German demarche. At the same time, it is important we also recognize the serious political concerns the demarche raises. For example, while there may be good reasons for the 15 percent fee — we understand it is a contingency fee not an administrative one — the appearance that the U.S. is charging Allies an excessive fee for the use of monies they have donated to the ANA Trust Fund may be difficult to explain away during a parliamentary debate. Brandenburg is probably correct in arguing that issues such as this could make it more difficult to encourage nations to donate to the Trust Fund. Indeed, it took us months to even work out the agreements we needed to get the original German donation to the Trust Fund. We therefore urge Washington to look into this issue from a political, as well as technical/financial, dimension and with as much transparency as possible. END COMMENT

The Demarche Text

—————–

10. (C/REL Germany) The text of the German non-paper is reproduced in full below:

BEGIN TEXT

3 February 2010

– Refer to GER Agreement dated October 1st with NATO acting through its Office of Resources by which GER has committed to a voluntary contribution of Euros 50 mio to the ANA Trust Fund. Funds had been transferred to a SHAPE account in late October 2009.

– Note the agreement that the GER contribution should be used exclusively for the aims set out in the ANA TF Project Document dated September 15th 2009, among them three prioritised projects mentioned in Annex 10 of the Project Document (1. ANS Logistic School Kabul, to the amount of Euro 2 mio in 2009; 2. Engineering School in Mazar-e-Sharif, to the amount of Euros 4 mio in 2009, 3. ANA Barracks in Feyzabad, to the amount of Euro 1 mio. in 2009). As of today, no project financing has occurred.

– Note that, at variance with the GER/IS agreement and the overarching MoU between the US, NATO and SHAPE on the “Management and Administration of Trust Fund Donations for support and sustainment of the ANA”, transfer of the German ANA TF contribution to an US treasury account (resulting in the prevalence of US procurement procedures, including assignment of the US Army Corps of Engineers and an administrative fee of 15 percent) would be made without due consideration of the German donation caveat, thereby hindering the early funding of the prioritised projects and thus the application of the German/IS Agreement.

– Note that the issue has been raised already in the German Parliament leading to questions why the Federal Government had donated money without any tangible effect on the prioritised projects yet. Likewise, charging a 15 percent fee for managing and executing ANA TF, especially when

USNATO 00000052 003 OF 003

applied to the funding of projects pursued by Germany, will inevitably attract heavy criticism by German audit bodies and parliamentary commissions.

– Request partners, given construction delays that have already occurred and the urgency of respective funding requirements, to revert to the letter and spirit of the GER/IS Agreement and make sure that funds earmarked for the prioritised projects totalling Euro 7 mio will be transferred without any further delay. As laid down in the GER/IS agreement the earmarked funds (with regard to the prioritised projects to the amount of Euro 7 mio, in particular with regard to the ANA Logistic School, Kabul, to the amount of Euro 2 mio., as the financially most pressing case, since construction is already under way) need to be re-allocated at the Kabul level to the GER Einsatzverwaltungsstelle ISAF in order to allow for a swift implementation of the prioritised projects.

– Urge partners to expedite the execution of funds donated by GER to the ANA TF aside from the prioritised projects and submit proofs of employment of funds in accordance with the US/NATO/SHAPE MoU as soon as possible.

– Express concern about the fact that any further delay in allocating funds to the prioritised GER projects and executing the remainder of funds donated by GER must substantially impair prospects for any further German contributions to the ANA TF.

END TEXT

HEFFERN

Back in 2001, European leaders accused the United States government of operating a vast industrial espionage network that was eavesdropping on European businesses and giving trade secrets to American companies.

• Bin Laden spotted in meeting with Taliban chief in 2006 
• Al Qaeda boss 'had hand' in plot to poison UK troops 
• Secret files claim British soldiers shot 16 children 
• Military experts: leaks could put our troops in peril 
• Taliban missile brought down Chinook helicopter

'Spotted': Among 91,000 leaked U.S. documents are claims that Osama Bin Laden was last seen in 2006

Toll: An Afghan girl in hospital in Helmand after being injured by coalition forces in an air strike in 2007

They include claims that 16 children were among those shot or bombed in error by British troops. 

The leaked military logs also reveal how a secret 'black' unit of crack special forces hunt down Taliban leaders for 'kill or capture' without trial  -  and voice concerns that Pakistani intelligence and Iran are supporting the insurgents. 

Downing Street said it 'would lament all unauthorised releases of classified material' and the White House condemned the ' irresponsible' leak of the files. 

And military and intelligence experts warned yesterday that the leaks could imperil the lives of British forces in Afghanistan.

Colonel Stuart Tootal, who in 2006 commanded 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment in Helmand Province  -  where more than 320 UK soldiers have been killed  -  said the information 'could impact on the security of our soldiers'. 

He insisted Nato forces now put a 'huge emphasis' on avoiding civilian casualties.
Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army captain, said: 'Although much of this information is in the public domain, the details are particularly damaging to the credibility of the coalition. 

'Our enemies will be quick to exploit the propaganda element of it. 

'If there are details of operational matters  -  locations, equipment, troops movements, resources  -  then soldiers' lives could be placed at risk.' 

Details of the secret files, detailing military operations between 2004 and 2009, were published yesterday by the Guardian, New York times and Germany's Der Spiegel while more than 75,000 records were made available on the WikiLeaks website. 

The files list 144 incidents involving Afghan civilian casualties, in which 195 died and 174 were injured. 

They detail coalition forces  -  fearful of suicide bombers  -  shooting unarmed drivers and civilian motorcyclists, and record an incident when French troops opened fire at a bus full of children because it came too close to a military convoy. 

Other leaked documents record a U.S. patrol machine-gunning a bus, killing or wounding 15 passengers, and Polish troops mortaring a village, killing a wedding party including a pregnant woman.

They reveal details of undercover operations by a U.S. special forces unit named task Force 373, formed to hunt down and kill or capture taliban and Al Qaeda commanders. 

According to Julian Assange, the founder of the website, the files contain details of 'thousands' of potential war crimes. 

At a press conference in London, he defended his decision to publish the files and claimed the high level of civilian casualties reported was in fact lower than the true figure because military personnel 'downplayed' the number or reported them as insurgent deaths. 

Mr Assange said: 'We have tried hard to make sure that this material does not put innocents at harm. 

'All the material is over seven months old so it is of no current operational consequence, even though it may be of very significant investigative consequence. 

'The revelation of abuse by the U.S. and coalition forces may cause Afghans to be upset, and rightly so. 

‘If governments don't like populations being upset, they should treat them better, not conceal abuses.' 

Professor Malcolm Chalmers, a defence expert at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said that the leaks could undermine already faltering public support for the war.

'This will reinforce the perception that things are very complicated and that it is a difficult war to get through and that perhaps it is best to bring our troops home.'

Taliban missile brought down an allied Chinook

The Taliban has acquired surface-to-air missiles and used them to shoot down a coalition helicopter, the logs reveal.

A British Army photographer, Corporal Mike Gilyeat, 28, was among seven soldiers killed when a Chinook was blasted out of the skies over Helmand in May 2007.

At risk: A Chinook helicopter, like those above, was brought down by a missile in May 2007

The leaked documents also report coalition aircraft coming under fire from Stinger missiles  -  supplied to Afghan rebels by the CIA to help them fight the Soviet invaders in the 1980s. 

Several Soviet Hind helicopters were brought down  -  one of the reasons the Kremlin decided to withdraw troops and abandon the country in 1989.

U.S. and British commanders have been accused of covering up the fact that the deadly missiles had fallen into the hands of insurgents.

The leaked documents record at least ten near-misses by surface-to-air weapons fired at coalition aircraft in the last four years. However, top brass have insisted that missiles passing within yards of allied helicopters were actually rocket-propelled grenades.

Insurgent leaders, who have no aircraft, are known to prize the downing of allied planes as part of their propaganda war. Colonel Stuart Tootal, who commanded the 3rd Battalion Parachute Regiment in Helmand Province in 2006, has warned it is a case of 'when, not if' a UK helicopter packed with troops is shot down by insurgents.

Helicopter pilots who saw the CH-47 Chinook carrying Cpl Gilyeat, of the Royal Military Police, five U.S. crew and a Canadian soldier nosedive to the ground reported that it had been hit by a 'Manpad'  -  a military term for a shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile.

The fears were apparently confirmed by two Apache attack helicopters hovering over the crash site which also came under fire from missiles 30 minutes later.

While both devices missed, the pilots reported that they were 'not an RPG' but a 'probable first-generation Manpad'.

The entry added: 'Clearly the Taliban were trying to down an Apache after downing the CH-47.'

In June 2006, a U.S. Black Hawk helicopter evacuating casualties came under fire 25 miles from Kandahar but evaded the missile. 

The log report read: 'The crew chief saw only the smoke trail due to evasive manoeuvring but determined that the missile was a type of Manpad.' 

North Korean link to Al Qaeda

North Korea took part in an arms deal with Al Qaeda chiefs, it was sensationally claimed in the documents. 

They state that in 2005 a senior militant and Osama bin Laden's financial adviser flew to North Korea from Iran to buy remote-controlled rockets to use against U.S. and coalition aircraft. 

And both Pakistan and Iran are accused of arming, training and financing the bloody Taliban insurgency against coalition forces. More than 180 intelligence files detail allegations that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency has been aiding the insurgents since at least 

The accusations include plots to train legions of suicide bombers, smuggle surface-toair missiles into Afghanistan and assassinate President Hamid Karzai. 

Iran provides arms, money and medical care for injured Taliban fighters, according to intelligence.

British troops 'killed Afghan children'

Sixteen children were among the civilians shot or bombed in error by British troops, according to claims in the leaked military logs.

The secret documents suggest Coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in incidents  that have never been reported.

The logs detail the toll on civilians -  ' blue on white' in military jargon - and reveals 144 incidents.

Some casualties come from air strikes but a large number of previously unknown incidents appears to be the result of troops  -  determined to protect themselves - shooting unarmed drivers or motorcyclists.

The bloody errors include the day French troops strafed a bus full of children in 2008, wounding eight. A US patrol machine-gunned another bus, wounding or killing 15 of its passengers.

Pride: The Prince of Wale talks to a soldier while presenting medals to British servicemen in Guetersloh, western Germany

In 2007 Polish troops mortared a village, killing six from a wedding party which included a pregnant woman, in an apparent revenge attack.

The bulk of the 'blue on white' file consists of civilian shootings by jumpy troops at checkpoints, near bases or on convoys.

The logs contain descriptions of 21 separate occasions in which British troops are said to have shot or bombed Afghan civilians - identifying at least 26 people killed and another 20 wounded as a result.

The number of dead or wounded allegedly caused by the British include 16 children, at least three woman and a mentally ill man.

Served with honour: Prince Charles chatted to the families as he honoured solidiers who had recently served in Afghanistan

It is a small fraction of the 369 civilian casualities listed in the log as due to coalition -  mostly US - action in total.

More than 320 UK soldiers have been killed since British troops were deployed to Helmand but the war logs describe two clusters of British shootings that do not appear to have been properly investigated.

There is a group of four shootings in Kabul in little more than a month in 2007 when civilians are wounded and a US report that after 'UK Coy reported force escalation' the son of an Afghan general died of subsequent gunshot wounds.

Documents also report a cluster of eight shootings involving Royal Marine commandos in Helmand in the six months from October 2008.

Four recorded instances of air strikes being called in by the UK also resulted in civilian casualites.

American death squads

A 'black' special forces squad led by the U.S. targets Taliban and Al-Qaeda figures in Afghanistan.
The team, Task Force 373, hunts for suspects on a 2,000 strong list to kill or capture, known as Jpel.

The log allegedly reveals the unit has killed innocent men, women and children and Afghan police officers who got in their way.

An entry on June 11 2007 told how a taskforce set out with Afghan special forces to capture or kill Taliban commander Qarl Ur-Rahman.

In April, Wikileaks published extracts from this 2007 video showing U.S. soldiers shooting civilians in Baghdad. U.S. intelligence analyst Bradley Manning is now being held for allegedly mishandling and leaking the data

Another still from the video shows Afghans falling as U.S. soldiers encourage each other to keep shooting

They crept up in the dark but opened fire when a torch was shone on them. A AC-130 gunship was called in for back up and started shooting.

The report said: 7x ANP KIA, 4x WIA - meaning seven Afghan police officers were dead and four wounded. The involvement of TF-373 was never mentioned.

Six days later, another taskforce armed with a HIMAR - a High Mobility Artillery Rocket System - was sent out to find Libyan fighter Abu Laith al-Libi.

They aimed to fire rockets at a village where they thought he was hiding and then send in ground troops.

But they failed to find Libi and killed six Taliban fighters. Searcing a madrassa after the attack, they found seven Taliban children dead or dying in the rubble.

The coalition admitted the deaths but blamed the attack on 'nefarious activity' when it was actually to find al-Libi. It also did not mention Nato forces had fired first, rather than in retaliation.

The internal report into the incident was marked 'secret' but also 'Noforn' - meaning it should not be shared with the foreign members of the coalition.

'The knowledge that TF-373 conducted a HIMARS strike must be protected,' it said.

Months later, in October 2007, a team confronted the Taliban in a village in Laswanday. They called in air support and 500lb bombs were dropped on a house from where they had been firing.

The incident left 12 U.S. wounded and one girl, a woman and four men dead. No Taliban fighters were wounded or killed. 

A statement claimed several insurgents had died and did not mention any civilians. Later it was admitted 'several non-combatants were found dead and others wounded' but there were no specifics.